Policy training, with an early pull toward institutions rather than theory alone.
My academic training is in public policy and peace and conflict studies, but I was drawn early to the
practical question of how public systems actually function under pressure. That pushed my work away from
policy as abstract design and toward governance, implementation, and delivery.
Institution-building in a conflict-affected setting.
In Syria, I founded and ran a charity school serving 100+ displaced youth at risk of drug addiction, gang
violence, and radicalisation, while supporting 10+ staff and raising more than $45,000 in donor funding
without institutional backing. That experience made the gap between formal goals and sustainable delivery
impossible to ignore. It also trained a habit that has stayed with me since: judge institutions not by
declared ambition, but by what they can actually hold together over time.
Execution-side exposure inside infrastructure delivery.
Later, I worked inside government-commissioned infrastructure projects in China, close to procurement,
sequencing, and contractor-government coordination. That gave me a more operational understanding of how
project pipelines stall, what implementation friction looks like in practice, and why approval is only one
stage in a much longer delivery chain.
City government, climate, and implementation-facing advisory work.
More recently, those threads have converged in Freetown through work on strategic climate portfolio
assessment, transport and mobility policy, air quality, vulnerability assessment, and informal-settlement
upgrading. The question I keep returning to is simple: what is genuinely in motion, what is still
preparatory, and what would help a public institution move one stage further.